Clothes

https://x.com/lowmegatron/status/1994466402195972199

Footwear

• barefoot shoes - nonplastic
• Earth Runners. A fantastic grounding sandal https://www.earthrunners.com/ https://x.com/iamjustapeater/status/1863771392312840579
• ARES Groundwear - Conductive Sneakers Grounded lifting shoes https://olympusearthwear.com/products/ares-groundwear
• APEX SHORT Gym clothes without the plastic https://rykerclothingco.com/
• ALPINEVILLE Elastic-free 100% Organic Merino Wool Socks https://rawganique.com/products/100-organic-merino-wool-socks-elastic-free

100% natural fibers

do not mix fibers

https://x.com/ze_rusty/status/1975934113812021395

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394428222_Electric_and_Dielectric_Properties_of_Cotton_and_Regenerated_Cellulose_Fibers_in_Comparison_with_Polyethylene_Terephthalate_Fiber

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15440478.2025.2537062

Natural Fabrics	Toxic Fabrics
Leather	Polyester
Silk	Viscose
Cashmere	Nylon
Wool	Acrylic
Cotton	Rayon
Linen	Spandex
Bamboo	Acetate
Hemp	Polyamide

Polyester and sexual function

Rats fitted with pants made of 100% polyester, a polyester-cotton blend, 100% cotton, or 100% wool were tested for sexual behavior before dressing and again at 6 and 12 months. The polyester and polyester-cotton groups showed a significantly reduced rate of successful mounting compared to controls, worsening from 6 to 12 months, while cotton and wool groups were unaffected. Polyester fabric generated a measurable electrostatic charge on the penis and scrotum; cotton and wool did not. Six months after the pants came off, sexual behavior in all groups returned to baseline. This is an animal study, but the electrostatic mechanism matches the dielectric differences measured directly between cotton/cellulose fibers and polyethylene terephthalate (polyester) fiber above.